<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/2/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/1/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/2/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbppni.com/content/4/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbppni.com/content/4/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbppni.com/content/3/1/26" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/4">
        <title>Comparison between partial ulnar and intercostal nerve transfers for reconstructing elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries </title>
        <description>Background:
There have been several reports that partial ulnar transfer (PUNT) is preferable for reconstructing elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) compared with intercostal nerve transfer (ICNT). The purpose of this study was to compare the recovery of elbow flexion between patients subjected to PUNT and patients subjected to ICNT.
Methods:
Sixteen patients (13 men and three women) with BPIs for whom PUNT (eight patients) or ICNT (eight patients) had been performed to restore elbow flexion function were studied. The time required in obtaining M1, M3 (Medical Research Council scale grades recovery) for elbow flexion and a full range of elbow joint movement against gravity with the wrist and fingers extended maximally and the outcomes of a manual muscle test (MMT) for elbow flexion were examined in both groups.
Results:
There were no significant differences between the PUNT and ICNT groups in terms of the age of patients at the time of surgery or the interval between injury and surgery. There were significantly more injured nerve roots in the ICNT group (mean 3.6) than in the PUNT group (mean 2.1) (P = 0.0006). The times required to obtain grades M1 and M3 in elbow flexion were significantly shorter in the PUNT group than in the ICNT group (P = 0.04 for M1 and P = 0.002 for M3). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the time required to obtain full flexion of the elbow joint with maximally extended fingers and wrist or in the final MMT scores for elbow flexion.
Conclusions:
PUNT is technically easy, not associated with significant complications, and provides rapid recovery of the elbow flexion. However, separation of elbow flexion from finger and wrist motions needed more time in the PUNT group than in the ICNT group. Although the final mean MMT score for elbow flexion in the PUNT group was greater than in the ICNT group, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups.</description>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Ryosuke Kakinoki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ryosuke Ikeguchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Scott Duncan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ken Nakayama</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Taiichi Matsumoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Soichi Ohta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Takashi Nakamura</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2010, 5:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-5-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/2/1/6">
        <title>Lateral Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve injury induced by phlebotomy</title>
        <description>Background:
Phlebotomy is one of the routine procedures done in medical labs daily.Case presentationA 52 yr woman noted shooting pain and dysesthesia over her right side anterolateral aspect of forearm, clinical examination and electrodiagnostic studies showed severe involvement of right side lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve.
Conclusion:
Phlebotomy around lateral aspect of antecubital fossa may cause lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury, electrodiagnostic studies are needed for definite diagnosis.</description>
        <link>http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/2/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>S Mansoor Rayegani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arezoo Azadi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2007, 2:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-2-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/5">
        <title>International symposium on peripheral nerve repair and regeneration and 2nd club Brunelli meeting </title>
        <description>The International Symposium &quot;Peripheral Nerve Repair and Regeneration and 2nd Club Brunelli Meeting&quot; was held on December 4-5, 2009 in Turin, Italy (Organizers: Bruno Battiston, Stefano Geuna, Isabelle Perroteau, Pierluigi Tos). Interest in the study of peripheral nerve regeneration is very much alive because complete recovery of nerve function almost never occurs after nerve reconstruction and, often, the clinical outcome is rather poor. Therefore, there is a need for defining innovative strategies for improving the success of recovery after nerve lesion and repair and this meeting was intended to discuss, from a multidisciplinary point of view, some of today&apos;s most important issues in this scientific field, arising from both basic and clinical neurosciences.</description>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Mehmet Turgut</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Geuna</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2010, 5:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-5-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>Exploring the potential effect of Ocimum sanctum in vincristine-induced neuropathic pain in rats
</title>
        <description>The present study was designed to investigate the ameliorative potential of Ocimum sanctum and its saponin rich fraction in vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathic pain in rats. Peripheral neuropathy was induced in rats by administration of vincristine sulfate (50 &#956;g/kg i.p.) for 10 consecutive days. The mechanical hyperalgesia, cold allodynia, paw heat hyperalgesia and cold tail hyperalgesia were assessed by performing the pinprick, acetone, hot plate and cold tail immersion tests, respectively. Biochemically, the tissue thio-barbituric acid reactive species (TBARS), super-oxide anion content (markers of oxidative stress) and total calcium levels were measured. Vincristine administration was associated with the development of mechanical hyperalgesia, cold allodynia, heat and cold hyperalgesia. Furthermore, vincristine administration was also associated with an increase in oxidative stress and calcium levels. However, administration of Ocimum sanctum (100 and 200 mg/kg p.o.) and its saponin rich fraction (100 and 200 mg/kg p.o.) for 14 days significantly attenuated vincristine-induced neuropathic pain along with decrease in oxidative stress and calcium levels. It may be concluded that Ocimum sanctum has ameliorative potential in attenuating chemotherapy induced-painful neuropathic state, which may be attributed to decrease in oxidative stress and calcium levels. Furthermore, saponin rich fraction of Ocimum sanctum may be responsible for its noted beneficial effect in neuropathic pain in rats.</description>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Gurpreet Kaur,</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amteshwar Jaggi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nirmal Singh</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2010, 5:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-5-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/1/1/7">
        <title>Intraoperative radial nerve injury during coronary artery surgery - report of two cases</title>
        <description>Background:
Peripheral nerve injury and brachial plexopathy are known, though rare complications of coronary artery surgery. The ulnar nerve is most frequently affected, whereas radial nerve lesions are much less common accounting for only 3% of such intraoperative injuries.Case presentationsTwo 52- and 50-year-old men underwent coronary artery surgery. On the first postoperative day they both complained of wrist drop on the left. Neurological examination revealed a paresis of the wrist and finger extensor muscles (0/5), and the brachioradialis (4/5) with hypoaesthesia on the radial aspect of the dorsum of the left hand. Both biceps and triceps reflexes were normoactive, whereas the brachioradialis reflex was diminished on the left. Muscles innervated from the median and ulnar nerve, as well as all muscles above the elbow were unaffected. Electrophysiological studies were performed 3 weeks later, when muscle power of the affected muscles had already begun to improve. Nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography revealed a partial conduction block of the radial nerve along the spiral groove, motor axonal loss distal to the site of the lesion and moderate impairment in recruitment with fibrillation potentials in radial innervated muscles below the elbow and normal findings in triceps and deltoid. Electrophysiology data pointed towards a radial nerve injury in the spiral groove. We assume external compression as the causative factor. The only apparatus attached to the patients&apos; left upper arm was the sternal retractor, used for dissection of the internal mammary artery. Both patients were overweight and lying on the operating table for a considerable time might have caused the compression of their left upper arm on the self retractor&apos;s supporting column which was fixed to the table rail 5 cm above the left elbow joint, in the site where the radial nerve is directly apposed to the humerus.
Conclusion:
Although very uncommon, external compression due to the use of a self retractor during coronary artery surgery can affect &#8211; especially in obese subjects &#8211; the radial nerve within the spiral groove leading to paresis and should therefore be included in the list of possible mechanisms of radial nerve injury.</description>
        <link>http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/1/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Marianna Papadopoulou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Konstantinos Spengos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Apostolos Papapostolou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georgios Tsivgoulis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nikolaos Karandreas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2006, 1:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-12-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-1-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-12-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/2/1/4">
        <title>Rapid recovery of serratus anterior muscle function after microneurolysis of long thoracic nerve injury</title>
        <description>Background:
Injury to the long thoracic nerve is a common cause of winging scapula. When the serratus anterior muscle is unable to function, patients often lose the ability to raise their arm overhead on the affected side.
Methods:
Serratus anterior function was restored through decompression, neurolysis, and tetanic electrical stimulation of the long thoracic nerve. This included partial release of constricting middle scalene fibers and microneurolysis of epineurium and perineurium of the long thoracic nerve under magnification. Abduction angle was measured on the day before and the day following surgery.
Results:
In this retrospective study of 13 neurolysis procedures of the long thoracic nerve, abduction is improved by 10% or greater within one day of surgery. The average improvement was 59&#176; (p &lt; 0.00005). Patients had been suffering from winging scapula for 2 months to 12 years. The improvement in abduction is maintained at last follow-up, and winging is also reduced.
Conclusion:
In a notable number of cases, decompression and neurolysis of the long thoracic nerve leads to rapid improvements in winging scapula and the associated limitations on shoulder movement. The duration of the injury and the speed of improvement lead us to conclude that axonal channel defects can potentially exist that do not lead to Wallerian degeneration and yet cause a clear decrease in function.</description>
        <link>http://www.JBPPNI.com/content/2/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Rahul Nath</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sonya Melcher</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2007, 2:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-02-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-2-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-02-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/content/4/1/17">
        <title>Serratus muscle stimulation effectively treats notalgia paresthetica caused by long thoracic nerve dysfunction: a case series</title>
        <description>Currently, notalgia paresthetica (NP) is a poorly-understood condition diagnosed on the basis of pruritus, pain, or both, in the area medial to the scapula and lateral to the thoracic spine. It has been proposed that NP is caused by degenerative changes to the T2-T6 vertebrae, genetic disposition, or nerve entrapment of the posterior rami of spinal nerves arising at T2-T6. Despite considerable research, the etiology of NP remains unclear, and a multitude of different treatment modalities have correspondingly met with varying degrees of success. Here we demonstrate that NP can be caused by long thoracic nerve injury leading to serratus anterior dysfunction, and that electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) of the serratus anterior can successfully and conservatively treat NP. In four cases of NP with known injury to the long thoracic nerve we performed transcutaneous EMS to the serratus anterior in an area far lateral to the site of pain and pruritus, resulting in significant and rapid pain relief. These findings are the first to identify long thoracic nerve injury as a cause for notalgia paresthetica and electrical muscle stimulation of the serratus anterior as a possible treatment, and we discuss the implications of these findings on better diagnosing and treating notalgia paresthetica.</description>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com/content/4/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Charlie Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alpana Gowda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meredith Barad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sean Mackey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian Carroll</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2009, 4:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-4-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Saphenous neuropathy in a patient with
low back pain. 

</title>
        <description>Saphenous nerve, a pure sensory nerve, may compromise as a result or complication of a surgical procedure or secondary to trauma or insidiously. We present a male patient with low back pain concomitant with pain in medial portion of left thigh in addition to pain and numbness in medial part of leg and inferior part of patella after a strenuous activity. Preliminary diagnosis suggested that the patient had radiculopathy but electrodiagnostic tests revealed the absence of left saphenous response both in medial leg and infrapatellar region, while normal findings were recorded from right side. Needle electromyography in L4 innervated muscles were normal. The patient had saphenous nerve entrapment in left thigh. Two months later symptoms relieved with conservative therapy.</description>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Tannaz Ahadi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gholamreza Raissi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mansoureh Togha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Parisa Nejati</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2010, 5:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-5-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/content/4/1/22">
        <title>Intraperitoneal Alpha-Lipoic Acid to prevent neural damage after crush injury to the rat sciatic nerve</title>
        <description>ObjectiveCrush injury to the sciatic nerve causes oxidative stress. Alfa Lipoic acid (a-LA) is a neuroprotective metabolic antioxidant. This study was designed to investigate the antioxidant effects of pretreatment with a-LA on the crush injury of rat sciatic nerve.
Methods:
Forty rats were randomized into four groups. Group I and Group II received saline (2 ml, intraperitoneally) and a-LA (100 mg/kg, 2 ml, intraperitoneally) in the groups III and IV at the 24 and 1 hour prior to the crush injury. In groups II, III and IV, the left sciatic nerve was exposed and compressed for 60 seconds with a jeweler&apos;s forceps. In Group I (n = 10), the sciatic nerve was explored but not crushed. In all groups of rats, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities, as well as malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were measured in samples of sciatic nerve tissue.
Results:
Compared to Group I, Group II had significantly decreased tissue SOD and CAT activities and elevated MDA levels indicating crush injury (p &lt; 0.05). In the a-LA treatment groups (groups III and IV), tissue CAT and SOD activities were significantly increased and MDA levels significantly decreased at the first hour (p &lt; 0.05) and on the 3rd day (p &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between a-LA treatment groups (p &gt; 0.05).
Conclusion:
A-LA administered before crush injury of the sciatic nerve showed significant protective effects against crush injury by decreasing the oxidative stress. A-LA should be considered in the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries, but further studies are needed to explain the mechanism of its neuroprotective effects.</description>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com/content/4/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Mehmet Senoglu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vedat Nacitarhan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ergul Kurutas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nimet Senoglu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Idris Altun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yalcin Atli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Davut Ozbag</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2009, 4:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-4-22</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jbppni.com/content/3/1/26">
        <title>Axillary nerve conduction changes in hemiplegia</title>
        <description>AimTo prove the possibility of axillary nerve conduction changes following shoulder subluxation due to hemiplegia, in order to investigate the usefulness of screening nerve conduction studies in patients with hemiplegia for finding peripheral neuropathy.
Methods:
Forty-four shoulders of twenty-two patients with a first-time stroke having flaccid hemiplegia were tested, 43 &#177; 12 days after stroke onset. Wasting and weakness of the deltoid were present in the involved side. Motor nerve conduction latency and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude were measured along the axillary nerve, comparing the paralyzed to the sound shoulder. The stimulation was done at the Erb&apos;s point whilst the recording needle electrode was inserted into the deltoid muscle 4 cm directly beneath the lateral border of the acromion. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the motor conduction between the sound and the paralytic shoulder. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare between plegic and sound shoulder in each side.
Results:
Mean motor nerve conduction latency time to the deltoid muscle was 8.49, SD 4.36 ms in the paralyzed shoulder and 5.17, SD 1.35 ms in the sound shoulder (p &lt; 0.001).Mean compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was 2.83, SD 2.50 mV in the paralyzed shoulder and was 7.44, SD 5.47 mV in the sound shoulder (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with right paralyzed shoulder compared to patients with right sound shoulder (p &lt; 0.001, 1-sided for latency; p = 0.003, 1-sided for amplitude), and patients with left paralyzed shoulder compared to patients with left sound shoulder (p = 0.011, 1-sided for latency, p = 0.001, 1-sided for amplitude), support the same outcomes. The electro-physiological changes in the axillary nerve may appear during the first six weeks after stroke breakout.
Conclusion:
Continuous traction of the axillary nerve, as in hypotonic shoulder, may affect the electro-physiological properties of the nerve. It most probably results from subluxation of the head of the humerus, causing demyelinization and even axonopathy. Slowing of the conduction velocities of the axillary nerve in the paralyzed shoulders may be related also to the lowering of the skin temperature and muscular atrophy in the same limb. The usefulness of routine screening nerve conduction studies in the shoulder of hemiplegic patients seems to be advocated.</description>
        <link>http://www.jbppni.com/content/3/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Atzmon Tsur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Haim Ring</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2008, 3:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1749-7221-3-26</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1749-7221</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
