JBPPNI


Open Access Methodology

Progesterone - new therapy in mild carpal tunnel syndrome? Study design of a randomized clinical trial for local therapy

Paolo Milani3,1,2*, Mauro Mondelli4, Federica Ginanneschi1, Riccardo Mazzocchio1 and Alessandro Rossi1

Author Affiliations

1 Dept. Neurological, Neurosurgical and Behavioural Sciences, Neurophysiology Clinic Section, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

2 Service de Physiologie Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France

3 Université Paris 7 Denis-Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France

4 EMG Service, Local Health Unit 7, Siena, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2010, 5:11 doi:10.1186/1749-7221-5-11

Published: 26 April 2010

Abstract

Background

Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) provides greater clinical improvement in symptoms one month after injection compared to placebo but significant symptom relief beyond one month has not been demonstrated and the relapse of symptoms is possible.

Neuroprotection and myelin repair actions of the progesterone was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro study.

We report the design of a randomized controlled trial for the local injection of cortisone versus progesterone in "mild" idiopathic CTS.

Methods

Sixty women with age between 18 and 60 years affected by "mild" idiopathic CTS, diagnosed on the basis of clinical and electrodiagnostic tests, will be enrolled in one centre. The clinical, electrophysiological and ultasonographic findings of the patients will be evaluate at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months after injection.

The major outcome of this study is to determine whether locally-injected progesterone may be more beneficial than cortisone in CTS at clinical levels, tested with symptoms severity self-administered Boston Questionnaire and with visual analogue pain scale.

Secondary outcome measures are: duration of experimental therapy; improvement of electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic anomalies at various follow-up; comparison of the beneficial and harmful effects of the cortisone versus progesterone.

Conclusion

We have designed a randomized controlled study to show the clinical effectiveness of local progesterone in the most frequent human focal peripheral mononeuropathy and to demonstrate the neuroprotective effects of the progesterone at the level of the peripheral nervous system in humans.